Cost Breakdown
Visual breakdown of where each dollar goes. Marketing typically represents 40-60% of burn.
Four paths to building SpotFynder, from bootstrap to seed
This interactive financial model shows four different funding scenarios for SpotFynder's first year. Each scenario represents a different level of ambition and risk tolerance. Use the tabs above to explore each path, and adjust the sliders below to see how changes in spending affect outcomes.
Key Assumptions:
$50-75K Bootstrap
$150-200K F&F
$300-400K Angel
$500K-1M Seed
Strategy: Focus entirely on Vancouver. Build core product with founders only. Use guerrilla marketing and organic growth tactics.
Key Trade-offs: Slower growth but maximum equity retention. No safety net - must achieve product-market fit quickly.
Success Metrics: 10K engaged users proving 15%+ D30i retention. Strong enough signal to raise a proper round.
Best For: Founders with prior exits, strong technical skills, or access to free resources. Requires extreme capital efficiency.
๐ก Founder Note: We believe the Lean scenario offers the best balance - enough runway to prove the model without excessive dilution. Vancouver's lower costs give us an efficiency advantage over US-only competitors.
AWS, APIs, Tools
$10,000
$833/month avg
Legal, Accounting, Admin
$10,000
Essential only
Content & Photographers
$15,000
2 cities
Influencers & Ads
$30,000
70% organic focus
Based on current market rates: Instagram micro-influencersi (5K-50K) charge $100-$500 per post, with LA commanding 20-30% premium over Vancouver.
Beyond cash payments, we'll implement a hybrid compensation model based on research showing equity can attract high-quality creators:
For consistency and immediate needs
For top performers and long-term partners
Early access, badges, event invites
Use these controls to stress-test the model. See how changes in key variables affect runway and growth.
Increase marketing spend to acquire users faster (but at higher CACi)
More cities = more seeding costs but larger addressable market
Higher user growth requires more server capacity and tools
Shows monthly spending (bars) and remaining cash balance (line). Notice higher burn in early months for setup costs.
S-curve growth model: slow start, rapid growth phase, then plateau as market saturates.
Spring/Summer focus aligns with peak exploration behavior. We front-load marketing spend when users are most active.
Visual breakdown of where each dollar goes. Marketing typically represents 40-60% of burn.
Base case assumes 1% of reached users install. What if it's lower?
LA influencers charge more. What if the premium is higher?
We're being conservative. We want to focus entirely on user growth and product-market fit in Year 1. Any revenue generated would be upside to this model.
As more users join, organic growth increases through word-of-mouth and social sharing. Network effectsi mean each user brings friends, reducing our need for paid acquisition.
The founding team can handle development for the MVPi. Delaying hires preserves cash and extends runwayi. We only hire when growth demands it.
We can scale down to a smaller scenario. Even $50K gets us to 10K users in Vancouver - enough to prove the concept and raise a larger round.